Bring together feedback from peers, managers, and teams to uncover strengths, blind spots, and growth opportunities that single-source reviews miss.

Performance is shaped by collaboration, influence, and behavior, not just individual output. When feedback comes from a single source, critical context is lost and insight remains incomplete.
Powerful tools designed to provide deeper clarity for teams and individuals.
Performance improves when insight reflects how work actually happens. By combining feedback from managers, peers, and collaborators, organizations gain a more complete, actionable view of impact.
Different viewpoints reveal how performance shows up across the organization. Strengths become clearer. Gaps surface earlier.

When questions reflect real responsibilities, feedback becomes more thoughtful and actionable. Employees receive guidance that actually applies to their work.

Automated aggregation removes noise and confusion. Managers and employees focus on meaning, not data cleanup.

Clear summaries turn feedback into direction. Growth conversations become structured, focused, and forward-looking.

Eight connected modules designed to work together, so performance conversations are consistent, fair, and focused on growth.








360-degree feedback is a performance evaluation method in which an employee receives structured feedback from multiple sources: their direct manager, peers, direct reports, and themselves through a self-assessment. The term '360 degrees' refers to feedback from all directions in the reporting relationship. It provides a more complete picture of performance than manager-only evaluations.
A standard 360 review includes: (1) the employee's direct manager, (2) 3–5 peers selected by the manager or employee, (3) direct reports if the employee is a people manager, and (4) the employee themselves via a self-assessment. Some organizations also include cross-functional stakeholders or internal customers. TraineryHCM allows HR to configure reviewer pools and select 360 participants per review cycle.
In most 360 implementations, peer and direct report feedback is kept anonymous to encourage honest responses and reduce fear of retaliation. Manager feedback is typically attributed. The level of anonymity depends on your organization's review design. TraineryHCM allows HR teams to configure anonymity settings per reviewer type, giving flexibility to match your culture and legal requirements.
A standard performance review is conducted by the employee's direct manager, a single perspective on performance. A 360-degree review collects input from multiple raters: peers, direct reports, the manager, and the employee. The broader perspective reduces manager bias and surfaces behavioral patterns that a single reviewer might not observe. Most organizations use 360 reviews to complement, not replace, manager evaluations.
Most organizations run 360 reviews annually or every 18 months. They require significant time from multiple participants, so running them too frequently creates survey fatigue. 360 feedback is most effective when tied to development goals: run a 360, create an IDP from the results, allow 12–18 months of development, then run another 360 to measure growth. TraineryHCM links 360 results directly to IDP creation.
The most important step after a 360 review is a structured debrief conversation, reviewing themes in the feedback rather than fixating on individual comments. High-quality 360 programs follow the debrief with an updated Individual Development Plan (IDP) that targets the top 1–2 development areas identified. In TraineryHCM, a new IDP can be launched directly from the 360 results screen.
TraineryHCM's TrAI layer analyzes 360 feedback responses for language patterns associated with unconscious bias, including gender-coded language, halo effects, and outlier ratings that deviate significantly from other raters. HR leaders can review flagged responses before results are shared, ensuring that 360 feedback reflects genuine behavioral observations rather than personal relationships or isolated incidents.
This is debated among HR practitioners. Many organizations use 360 feedback for development purposes only, keeping it separate from compensation to preserve the psychological safety needed for honest feedback. Others incorporate 360 scores as a weighted input in the overall performance rating that drives merit decisions. TraineryHCM supports both approaches: 360 data can be included or excluded from the compensable rating depending on your review design.
Use 360 reviews to uncover strengths, identify gaps, and guide personalized development with confidence.